<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Jquery really that much more trendy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.84bytes.com/2009/04/02/is-jquery-really-that-much-more-trendy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.84bytes.com/2009/04/02/is-jquery-really-that-much-more-trendy/</link>
	<description>A web development blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thobib</title>
		<link>http://www.84bytes.com/2009/04/02/is-jquery-really-that-much-more-trendy/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Thobib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.84bytes.com/?p=281#comment-567</guid>
		<description>i think Yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beeching</title>
		<link>http://www.84bytes.com/2009/04/02/is-jquery-really-that-much-more-trendy/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beeching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.84bytes.com/?p=281#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a better measure would be to chart how many jobs there are in anyone place (or globally) that specify each framework as a pre-requisite? IMO: jQuery hugely popular as it has lowest barrier to entry, and is more designer-friendly than other frameworks. That&#039;s not to say it isn&#039;t extremely powerful if you know what you&#039;re doing of course. 

Finally, nice site design! Very easy on the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a better measure would be to chart how many jobs there are in anyone place (or globally) that specify each framework as a pre-requisite? IMO: jQuery hugely popular as it has lowest barrier to entry, and is more designer-friendly than other frameworks. That&#8217;s not to say it isn&#8217;t extremely powerful if you know what you&#8217;re doing of course. </p>
<p>Finally, nice site design! Very easy on the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V1</title>
		<link>http://www.84bytes.com/2009/04/02/is-jquery-really-that-much-more-trendy/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>V1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.84bytes.com/?p=281#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Those stats just prove nothing about the popularity of framework, maybe those are all people who get stuck with jQuery and search for help... You don&#039;t know :). Because as far i know, the only offline documentation jQuery provides a an AIR api, and thats basically it. So people are FORCED to go to the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those stats just prove nothing about the popularity of framework, maybe those are all people who get stuck with jQuery and search for help&#8230; You don&#8217;t know <img src='http://www.84bytes.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Because as far i know, the only offline documentation jQuery provides a an AIR api, and thats basically it. So people are FORCED to go to the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

